markus.technology

Menschen, Medien, Technologie (Podcast)

Kategorie: Digitalpolitik

  • Who Owns The Checkout?

    Who Owns The Checkout?

    Sweden’s Cash Law, Stripe’s $53bn Bid, and the Digital Euro

    Sarahs Tech, episode 9. My co-host Sarah is an AI voice — the research, the arguments and the responsibility here are mine. There’s more on why the show works that way over here.

    I recorded this one because of a coincidence I couldn’t shake. In a single week in July, three payment stories broke that everyone treated as separate. Sweden — the most cashless country in Europe — passed a law forcing supermarkets to take cash again. Stripe bid fifty-three billion dollars for PayPal. And the European Parliament quietly sent the digital euro into trilogue.

    FEATURED IMAGE: sarahstech_e09s01.png (alt: "Sarahs Tech episode 9 cover — Who Owns the Checkout")
    (Click to listen on Apple Podcast page)

    Read individually, they’re three headlines. Read together, they’re one question, asked from three directions: who owns the checkout? Who controls the rails your money actually runs on. That’s the whole episode.

    Sweden hit the brakes — and it wasn’t nostalgia

    Here’s what got me. Only five percent of Swedes paid cash for their last in-store purchase. Five percent. This is the country that put card readers in churches. And since the first of July, grocery stores and pharmacies there are legally required to accept cash again.

    The reasoning isn’t sentimental, it’s engineering. After 180-plus outages at their main payment app in one year, and DDoS attacks knocking out the country’s core digital ID, the Riksbank drew a conclusion any of us who run infrastructure already know in our bones: a system with only one mode isn’t a system. It’s a single point of failure. Sweden didn’t abandon digital. It added a fallback layer. That distinction runs through everything that follows.

    What Stripe is actually buying

    PayPal is down about ninety percent from its 2021 peak. So why would Stripe pay fifty-three billion for it? Because Stripe isn’t buying the technology — it’s buying the relationship. Stripe owns the merchant side, the checkout, the developer API. What it has never had is a consumer wallet that hundreds of millions of people opened voluntarily. PayPal is exactly that.

    For anyone here who runs a shop or builds checkout software, that’s the part worth sitting with. When the infrastructure behind the checkout and the customer-facing wallet end up in one hand, you eventually negotiate fees, terms and data access with a counterpart you can’t route around. And in this episode, Sarah pushes me on whether „European dependency“ is a real risk or just a talking point. I don’t let myself off the hook easily.

    The digital euro: what it is, and what it isn’t

    This is where most coverage falls apart, so we slowed right down. The digital euro is central bank money — the same currency as the cash in your pocket, in digital form. Not a cryptocurrency, not a new currency, not a coin that swings in value. The key difference from the balance in your bank account is the counterparty: a deposit is a claim against your bank, the digital euro would be a claim against the ECB itself.

    Two things I want on the record, because I keep seeing them mangled. First: nothing is decided. The July 9th vote was a negotiating mandate, not a regulation, and even after the law passes the ECB alone decides whether to issue. Second: that famous three-thousand-euro holding limit is a discussion figure, not law — and its purpose is banking statics, not surveillance. Without a cap, deposits could drain from commercial banks into central bank money within hours during a crisis. The limit exists to prevent a design flaw, not to restrict you.

    We also take the hard questions head-on: surveillance, cash abolition, programmability. There’s one objection I genuinely couldn’t argue away, and I say so on air rather than pretend otherwise.

    Europe isn’t building the next PayPal. Europe is building the ground a European PayPal could actually stand on.

    Could Europe build its own SWIFT?

    Sarah set this up as the big ambitious question — and then dismantled the premise, which is exactly why I wanted her to ask it. SWIFT settles no money at all; it’s a messaging network. And it’s already a Belgian cooperative. Europe owns SWIFT. The real dependency sits somewhere else entirely — at the register and in the online checkout, and increasingly in dollar-denominated stablecoins.

    The honest answer comes in three layers. The retail euro is built small on purpose — it’s defense, not an export product. The genuine international ambition lives in the wholesale projects almost nobody talks about, Pontes and Appia, one of which starts piloting this quarter. And reserve-currency status? That depends on the depth of capital markets, not on code. Technology can open the door. Politics has to walk through it.

    What you can do with this

    • If your checkout runs on exactly one payment provider, you’ve got the Sweden problem in miniature — one mode, no failover. Worth an honest look regardless of how the Stripe deal plays out.
    • Watch the trilogue through the end of 2026. That’s when we’ll know whether the 2029 timeline for the digital euro holds. If you build shop or POS software, the planned acceptance obligation is your planning signal — a topic for the roadmap after next, not the next one.
    • Keep half an eye on Pontes and Appia. If settlement in central bank money becomes standard, the interesting work usually appears one layer below the hype.

    Chapters

    • 00:00 — Cold open & full transparency
    • 01:55 — Sweden backpedals
    • 04:55 — The $53 billion bid
    • 07:50 — Data sovereignty, made concrete
    • 10:15 — What the digital euro is (and isn’t)
    • 16:45 — The SWIFT question
    • 23:15 — Practice & outro

    Listen & subscribe

    Episode 9 is out now. If it’s useful, the best thing you can do is subscribe wherever you listen — it’s how the show finds the next few hundred people who care about this stuff. And if you run a checkout with one provider, are building software that might have to handle a digital euro by 2029, or simply think the whole project is a mistake, I want to hear it. Reply, or drop me a note — anonymously if you prefer. The sharpest responses tend to end up in a future episode.

    Listen

    — Markus

    Sources & further reading

    Sweden: cash comes back

    Stripe’s bid for PayPal

    The digital euro: legislation

    • ECB — Digital euro project: the official overview, timeline and FAQ, straight from the issuer.
    • Council of the EU — Negotiating mandate (PDF): the Council’s December 2025 position that went into trilogue — primary text, not a summary.
    • European Parliament: the 9 July 2026 plenary confirmed the negotiating mandate (416 in favour, 169 against, 22 abstentions); rapporteur Fernando Navarrete Rojas leads Parliament’s team. Search „digital euro“ in the newsroom for the statement.

    Wholesale: where the real ambition sits

    What SWIFT actually is

    • SWIFT — About us: confirms the two things the episode hangs on — it’s a messaging cooperative, and it’s based in Belgium.

    About the show

    • A Note on Sarah: why this podcast discloses its synthetic host, and how the AI/human split works.
  • The Strategy Illusion

    The Strategy Illusion

    What Bosses Believe, What Builders Know (Sarah’s Tech S1·E08)

    80% of European industrial companies say they have an AI strategy. The developers who build the actual products trust AI output at 29%. Someone here is wrong — or, more uncomfortably, nobody is.

    The new episode of Sarahs Tech is out, and it lives in the gap between those two numbers.

    What this episode is about

    We start with a bet. Before the jingle, Markus claims AI makes him about twenty percent faster. Would he put money on that? He shouldn’t. A research lab recently put a stopwatch on experienced developers working on real tasks — randomized, screens recorded, time measured. With AI, they were 19% slower. And afterwards, they estimated they had been 20% faster. That forty-point gap between feeling and reality is the theme of the whole episode.

    From there, we take the elevator through European tech, floor by floor:

    The status report from the wall. The EU AI Act’s transparency rules go live on August 2nd — and no, the „delay“ you read about doesn’t apply to you. The high-risk rules were pushed to 2027 and 2028; the labeling duties arrive on time. There are official EU icons now („AI GENERATED“ / „AI MODIFIED“), the label belongs inside the content rather than the caption, and unlike NIS2, anyone with a smartphone can spot a violation. We walk through what that means for marketing teams, agencies, publishers and podcasters — including one detail that surprised us: AI translation counts as content that needs marking.

    The view from the top floor. A fresh survey asked 800 industrial decision-makers across eight European countries about digital strategy. The results look great. Suspiciously great: 88% have a digitalization strategy, 80% an AI strategy, 92% plan new digital business models within three years. We do the source criticism this study deserves — and then dig out the three findings that are genuinely revealing. Data sovereignty ranks only third among infrastructure priorities, behind security and cost. Only half of decision-makers see Europe as one unified market — and the country that believes in it most is Germany, while France believes in it least. Germany dreams the European dream. Alone.

    The view from the workbench. The people actually building the products tell a different story. Developer adoption of AI tools is basically done (84%), but trust in the output collapsed to 29% — and the most experienced developers are the most skeptical. Two thirds name the same frustration: solutions that are almost right, but not quite. Meanwhile, DACH freelancers have quietly turned pragmatic: more than half use AI daily, 18% already report lower hourly rates because of it, and 44% don’t tell their clients at all. That silence gets expensive after August 2nd.

    We close with a practical four-step checklist to get ready for the deadline — inventory, review workflow, labels, contracts — plus one piece of advice for freelancers that has survived every technology Markus has worked with since 2000: say it before they ask.

    One more thing

    We open this episode with a confession. Sarah — the host this show is named after — doesn’t exist. Her voice is synthetic, her personality is a writing device, and everything she says is researched, written and editorially owned by Markus. From August 2nd, that disclosure becomes a legal requirement. We’re just early. Full concept behind Sarah: markus.technology/sarah

    Listen now

    🎧 Listen to the episode on your favorite podcast app or directly here:

    Subsidized Sovereignty | Joomla's Government Money, Denmark's Linux Laptops, and Europe's Open Source Bet – Sarah's Tech

    Episode 10: Subsidized Sovereignty | Joomla's Government Money, Denmark's Linux Laptops, and Europe's Open Source Bet A twenty-year-old CMS gets state funding — not to be better than WordPress, but to be accessible under EU law. Germany builds openDesk as its "official" office suite, the International Criminal Court drops Microsoft after being cut off, and Denmark ships Microsoft-free laptops while Berlin writes strategy papers. Sarah and Markus map Europe's three sovereignty strategies and ask the uncomfortable question: is compliance-driven funding real sovereignty — or is Europe just buying conformity with its own rules? In this episode: 00:00–04:55: Cold Open & The Hook. Can Markus fork Sarah? A synthetic host with Polish founders, a London office, American investors and a proprietary API turns out to be the case study for the whole episode. Then the headline: Joomla receives an investment from the Sovereign Tech Fund — a twenty-month accessibility program targeting WCAG 2.2, with an independent external audit. Funded for compliance, not for competition. 04:55–09:02: The Plumbing of the Internet. The machine behind the headline: the Sovereign Tech Agency and why it funds boring infrastructure instead of shiny apps. openDesk and ZenDiS — more than eighty thousand migrated workplaces in German public administration. The ICC incident that turned an abstract risk into a concrete one. And EVB-IT Open Source: why standardized procurement contracts matter more than manifestos. Public Money, Public Code gets real purchasing tools. 09:02–14:02: The Map, Part One. Who in Europe is actually doing this? The stack builders (Germany, France) treat sovereignty as industrial policy. The pragmatic switchers take what exists: Denmark's timeline from the June 2025 announcement to the first Microsoft-free government PC in December 2025 to the SIA Open pilot — NixOS-based Linux and LibreOffice, with a target of up to fifteen thousand state employees by end of 2026. Why the trigger was Greenland, not software quality. Plus Austria's Nextcloud deployment and Schleswig-Holstein as the small country inside a big one. 14:02–25:41: Digital Natives, Free Riders & Three Uncomfortable Questions. Estonia defines sovereignty as continuity: the data embassy in Luxembourg, X-Road shared with Finland and Iceland, and a threat model pointing east, not west. "Survive first, purify later." Sarah opens the free-rider problem: core Europe funds the commons, everyone else forks for free. Then Markus's three questions — who writes and merges the code (and what US sanctions law did to the Linux kernel), where the applications actually run, and whether funding for compliance produces software that passes audits instead of software people love. Sarah pushes back hard, Markus concedes, and the episode lands on its verdict: compliance as the trojan horse for sovereignty, reversibility as risk management, and three takeaways for the internet business. The final question for listeners: is the fork enough insurance — or does Europe need its own foundations, forges and clouds before it may use the word sovereignty? 25:41–27:33: Outro Song. "Sarahs Tech" — like the host, mainly synthetic: the track was produced primarily with AI. Key Takeaways: Compliance Is the Business Model: Europe funds open source to meet its own rules — accessibility, GDPR, security standards. That sounds circular, but regulation as a built-in feature ("we're already legal") may become the export product, the way safety standards once shaped European carmakers. There Is Real Money Now: Public funds, standardized procurement contracts, reseller programs. For agencies, hosters and software companies this is a market, not a manifesto. Watch the Small Countries: Denmark went from announcement to deployed Microsoft-free laptops in eighteen months. Small states can't afford ideology — they need exits, not empires. What they choose becomes the template. Origin vs. Control: Two competing definitions of sovereignty divide Europe. "Buy European" is about where software comes from; "Public Code" is about who controls it. The small countries already voted for the second. The Fork Is Power, Not a Guarantee: Open source shifts the balance because someone else can always continue the software. But code is not extraterritorial — foundations, platforms and maintainers remain subject to jurisdiction, and a fork doesn't help if everything runs on someone else's cloud. Links & Resources: The Funding Machine: Sovereign Tech Agency — Investments in Open Digital Infrastructure The CMS in Question: Joomla — Project Site and Accessibility Program Announcements The "Official" Office Suite: openDesk — The Open Source Workplace for the Public Sector Behind openDesk: ZenDiS — Center for Digital Sovereignty The Argument: Open Source Business Alliance — "Buy European Is Not Enough" Public Money, Public Code: FSFE Campaign — If It Is Public Money, It Should Be Public Code Denmark's Exit: Danish Agency for Digital Government Transparency Concept: A Note on Sarah — Why This Show Discloses Its Synthetic Host Feedback: Is your organization migrating away from proprietary software — or did such a migration fail? Do you build on open source and wonder who should pay for the commons? Send your view — anonymously if you prefer — to feedback@experten-system.de. The best responses make it into a future episode.

    All sources — the FACIS survey, the Stack Overflow Developer Survey, the METR stopwatch study, the freelancer studies, the Article 50 guidelines and the Code of Practice with the icons — are linked in the show notes.

    Are you the manager with the strategy, the developer with the trust problem, or the freelancer deciding whether to tell the client? Write to us — the best stories make it into a future episode, anonymously if you prefer.

    Sarahs Tech — a show hosted by someone who doesn’t exist, with facts that very much do.

  • Fractured Monoliths and Gilded Cages

    Fractured Monoliths and Gilded Cages

    The sound that started Season 1, Episode 5 of Sarahs Tech was a heavy coffee mug slamming onto the table. It was the sound of my co-host, Sarah, running on three hours of sleep and absolute fury. Why?

    Over the weekend, Washington drew a digital line in the sand. Anthropic pulled its top-tier Claude models offline globally. Why? Sudden US Department of Commerce export controls. Software treated like military hardware. The lockout was so strict it even affected Anthropic’s own European developers. Europeans are, once again, looking into an empty tube.

    Sarah called it digital segregation. I call it architectural inevitable.

    This episode was supposed to be a deep dive into the reports of Enrico Letta and Mario Draghi on European competitiveness. But the Anthropic shock proved the exact point I keep making: relying on centralized American monoliths is a high-risk strategy.

    Digital Fiefdoms and Renters

    We had an intense debate about why Europe regulators build beautifully formatted, GDPR-compliant cookie banners while Seattle-based hyperscalers manage 90% of all European corporate data. Sarah argues we are just a „digital colony“—renters in a house owned by Seattle.

    We analyzed the regional contradictions:

    • The Nordic Mirage: Scandinavia is a tech paradise for user adoption (BankID, MitID), but architecturally, they national national islands that have handed the keys of the kingdom to AWS and Azure.
    • The French Compromise: Mistral AI preaches European independence, then immediately signs a partnership with Microsoft.
    • The Italian Guillotine: The data protection authority blocks everything first, prioritizing dignity over Roman jobs.
    • The Spanish Socket: Spain builds the physical data centers, Strain Strain its regional grid and water supplies, while profits and algorithmic intelligence fly back to California.

    The Fragmentation of the US Monolith

    While I understand Sarah’s frustration with European hesitation, she often praises the US as this perfect, frictionless monolith where scaling is easy.

    That is a myth. In mid-2026, the US market is fracturing at a terrifying pace.

    Culturally, localization is now essential (the massive economic superpower of the Hispanic population means you need Spanish-First deep local marketing). But more importantly, it is fracturing legally. Washington has completely failed to pass a federal privacy law. US states have taken over.

    For a modern tech startup in the US, compliance is now a legal minefield spanning Arkansas, California (with its new Delete Act), Indiana, Kentucky, and Rhode Island. They are experiencing exactly the kind of Zersplitterung Sarah blames Europe for.

    The Blueprint for Sanity: Federated Hybrid Strategy

    It was here, looking at the Netherlands-based powerhouse Nebius Group, that we found our middle ground.

    Nebius is building the heavy AI factories Europe needs, but they are architecturally locked into NVIDIA’s proprietary software trap. They are becoming high-end data foundries and power-grid providers for American models. As I told Sarah, they supply the electricity; California harvests the intelligence.

    The corporate cloud silo is breaking down under its own legal and physical weight.

    We cannot wait for permission. We must utilize global efficiency without surrendering local sovereignty. The future is not monolithic.

    Our compromise is the Federated Hybrid Strategy. We use the global hardware networks—for compute power and raw engineering speed (shout-out to site.pro in Lithuania for pragmatic, Baltic code). But we keep our data governance and our execution layers completely local. We run local stacks (Ollama, Jan.ai) right on our desks. We build a network of sovereign, highly automated nodes that talk across borders without ever surrendering their core data.

    We out-engineer the monopolies at a human scale.

    Listen to the full debate and find the economic reports (Letta, Draghi) in our show notes on Substack. If you are a Baltic dev or part of the „clean code“ movement in Eastern Europe, I’d love to hear your take on the Federated architecture in the comments.

    The Monolithic Myth & The Federated Compromise – Sarah's Tech

    Episode 5: The Monolithic Myth & The Federated Compromise Can Europe survive as an independent tech ecosystem, or are we permanently trapped as digital tenants of foreign empires? In this high-stakes episode, Sarah and Markus strip away the polished corporate marketing of modern cloud tech. They analyze the immediate fallout of the sudden US tech embargo on advanced models, expose why the European single market remains a regulatory illusion, and establish a real-world architectural blueprint for digital sovereignty without losing commercial scale. In this episode: 00:00–02:30: Cold Open: The Anthropic Embargo. Reacting to the breaking news of US export controls abruptly pulling Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 offline for all foreign nationals globally. 02:30–06:45: Act 1: The Single Market Fairytale. Dissecting the brutal realities of the Letta and Draghi reports, the 40% compliance tax on local startups, and telecom fragmentation. 06:45–12:30: Act 2: The Regional Tour. Deconstructing the Nordic digital mirage (MitID running on AWS), France's Mistral AI corporate compromises, Italy's data protection guillotine, and Spain's power-grid colonialism. 12:30–14:00: Sponsor Spotlight (site.pro): Stable, visually modifiable web architecture built to survive the tech debt of fragile AI prompt-to-code platforms. 14:00–18:15: Act 4: The Geopolitical Thriller. Analyzing the massive expansion of Amsterdam's Nebius Group and shattering the myth of a frictionless US market via state-level privacy fragmentation and the California Delete Act. 18:15–20:30: Act 5: The Federated Hybrid Strategy. Reaching a technical compromise: Out-engineering the monopolies by utilizing global hardware speed while maintaining local data governance via open weights. 20:30–22:00: Featured Outro Song: "Sarah's Tech Show" (The official pop-rock theme). Key Takeaways: The Deemed Export trap: Why US security panic can instantly paralyze international developers and European tech platforms overnight. The electric socket dilemma: How hosting foreign server farms strains local utility grids while exporting the core algorithmic value back to California. Why the monolithic market model is structurally dead on both sides of the Atlantic due to regulatory balkanization. How to configure a zero-trust, automated corporate edge network using desktop open-weight architectures. Links & Resources: Ad Affiliate URL Sponsor): site.pro AI Website Builder (Pragmatic, stable, and client-proof) Geopolitical Context: The US Export Control Directive on Anthropic Claude Fable 5 / Mythos 5 covered by Telepolis. Official Reports: Enrico Letta’s "Much More Than a Market" and Mario Draghi’s EU Competitiveness Report (Available via the European Commission archive). Sovereign Infrastructure: Nebius Group Amsterdam, plus local deployment engines Ollama and Jan.ai. Newsletter & Analysis Archive: Sarah's Tech on Substack Feedback: Are you ready to deploy a Federated Hybrid Strategy or are you staying locked in the corporate cloud cage? Share your network architecture or voice your thoughts via feedback@experten-system.de.

  • Neu: Sarahs Tech – Podcast

    Neu: Sarahs Tech – Podcast

    Neben meinem deutschen Podcast ‚Menschen Medientechnologie‘ hoste ich ab sofort einen neuen, englischsprachigen Feed auf dieser Domain. Zusammen mit Sarah Vejlby streite ich mich in ‚Sarahs Tech‘ über die Zukunft der europäischen Infrastruktur. Hier ist, worum es geht…“

    The digital landscape is fracturing, and sterile corporate tech podcasts simply don’t cut it anymore. That is why I am expanding the architecture of markus.technology to host a brand-new format: Sarahs Tech. This is not an echo chamber where two hosts politely nod at every new Silicon Valley marketing brochure.

    Instead, it is an unpolished, high-stakes verbal sparring match between aggressive market ambition and bare-metal infrastructure reality. Sarah brings the high-energy drive for venture-backed speed and modern platform scaling. I anchor the debate in server-room facts, data privacy, and the critical necessity of European digital sovereignty. We don’t filter our thoughts, and we don’t fix the friction.

    Listen on Apple Podcasts

    Our latest episodes tear down the glossy facades of the industry to look at the gritty geopolitical realities of 2026. We dissect the myth of the „European Digital Single Market“ using raw economic indicators from the Letta and Draghi reports. Coming up: We trace the economic thriller of Amsterdam’s Nebius Group scaling massive GPU clusters for US monopolies, and we dismantle the illusion of a homogeneous American market.

    But we do not just complain about the „gilded cages“ of Big Tech. We actively build blueprints for operational survival—from running local, open-weight AI stacks via Ollama and Jan.ai right on your own desk, to engineering a resilient, Federated Hybrid Strategy for modern web agencies.

    Sarahs Tech is fast-paced, sharp-tongued, and intentionally „unglätt“—designed for webmasters, developers, and tech leaders who want to hear what happens when macro-economic ambition clashes with sovereign engineering. The official podcast feed is hosted directly on this domain. If you are tired of sterile tech marketing and ready for real, structural trade-offs, add our XML feed to your independent podcast player, plug in your headphones, and join the architectural rebellion.

    Find all episode from Sarah’s tech at Apple and Spotifiy. Listen for free.

  • Die Tech-Zukunft: KI-Assistenten, Content-Plattformen und Quantennetzwerke

    Die Tech-Zukunft: KI-Assistenten, Content-Plattformen und Quantennetzwerke

    Technologietrends 2025 ist die thematische Klammer der Inhalte der neuesten Folge des goneo Podcasts, Episode 130, aufgezeichnet Ende Mai 2025. Die Moderatoren Markus und Sarah tauchen wieder tief in die Welt der Technologie ein und beleuchten die tatsächliche Wirkung von KI-Assistenten, den milliardenschweren Verkauf von OnlyFans, die Vor- und Nachteile eigenen Hostings, neue rechtliche Herausforderungen wie das TAKE IT DOWN Gesetz (Wortlaut) und bahnbrechende Entwicklungen in der Quantenkommunikation. Erkenntnisse und Trends, die unsere digitale Zukunft prägen.

    KI-Assistenten: Hype vs. Realität

    Die Folge beginnt mit einer kritischen Analyse von KI-Assistenten wie ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot und dem neu erschienenen Claude 4 von Anthropic. Eine aktuelle Studie des National Bureau of Economic Research (https://www.nber.org/papers/w33777) zeigt überraschende Ergebnisse: Diese Tools bringen kaum Zeitersparnis, insbesondere bei komplexen Aufgaben wie Programmierung.

    Markus berichtet aus eigener Erfahrung, dass das Optimieren von Prompts oft mehr Zeit kostet als es spart – ein Problem, das ihn an die frühen Tage von WYSIWYG-Editoren erinnert. Sarah betont, dass kreative Aufgaben wie das Schreiben von Marketingtexten oder Brainstorming davon profitieren, aber die Qualität der Ergebnisse stark von den Prompts abhängt – eine Fähigkeit, die vielen Nutzern fehlt.

    Claude 4 (https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-4) bietet mit seinen Varianten Sonnet und Opus verbesserte Coding- und Problemlösungsfähigkeiten, richtet sich jedoch preislich eher an Unternehmen.

    Microsofts NLWeb (https://www.golem.de/news/nlweb-microsoft-bietet-ki-gestuetzte-website-suche-an-2505-196351.html) führt eine natürliche Sprachsuche für Websites ein, wirft jedoch als Cloud-Dienst Datenschutzbedenken in Europa auf.

    Content-Plattformen vs. eigenes Hosting

    Ein zentrales Thema ist der gemeldete Verkauf von OnlyFans für 8 Milliarden Dollar (https://www.manager-magazin.de/unternehmen/onlyfans-umstrittene-internetplattform-soll-fuer-8-milliarden-dollar-verkauft-werden-a-ed866027-8dda-4026-ae82-748aa30265b4), einer Plattform, deren Umsatz von 375 Millionen Dollar im Jahr 2020 auf 6,6 Milliarden im Jahr 2023 explodierte.

    Markus, ein Hosting-Experte, argumentiert, dass Kreative um die 20% ihrer Einnahmen an solche Plattformen abgeben und empfiehlt eigenes Hosting, um Kontrolle und Gewinn zu maximieren. Sarah entgegnet, dass Plattformen fertige Lösungen bieten – Zahlungsabwicklung, Community-Tools und eine bestehende Nutzerbasis –, aber Risiken wie Gebührenerhöhungen oder Inhaltsverbote nach einem Verkauf bestehen.

    Dazu passt das TAKE IT DOWN Gesetz (https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/20/take_it_down_law/), ein US-Gesetz, das Websites verpflichtet, nicht-einvernehmliche intime Bilder innerhalb von 48 Stunden zu entfernen, mit Strafen von 50.120 Dollar pro Verstoß.

    Für kleine Betreiber ist das eine Herausforderung, da sie aus Angst vor Strafen Inhalte vorsorglich zensieren könnten, was die rechtliche Last des eigenen Hostings verdeutlicht.

    KI und Medien: Chancen und Risiken der Technologietrends 2025

    Google führt neue Metriken in der Search Console ein (https://www.seroundtable.com/google-ai-mode-reporting-search-console-39468.html), die die Sichtbarkeit von KI-generierten Inhalten messen – ein Schritt hin zu „SEO für KI“. Dies könnte Optimierungsstrategien neu definieren, birgt jedoch Risiken für neue Black-Hat-Taktiken.

    Besorgniserregend ist Veo 3 (https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/673719/google-veo-3-ai-video-audio-sound-effects), Googles KI-Videogenerator mit Audiofähigkeiten, der überzeugende Deepfakes erstellen kann. Zwar gibt es Schutzmaßnahmen gegen die Darstellung realer Personen, doch das Potenzial für Desinformation – etwa gefälschte Nachrichten oder Katastrophenszenarien – ist alarmierend.

    Die Moderatoren betonen die Notwendigkeit robuster Erkennungsmechanismen, da KI-generierte Inhalte Plattformen wie YouTube Kids überschwemmen.

    Technologische Souveränität und Zukunftstrends

    Europas Streben nach digitaler Souveränität stößt auf Hindernisse: Ein Politico-Bericht (auch bei https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/22/ditching_us_clouds_for_local/?td=rt-3a) zeigt, dass eine vollständige Abkehr von US-Cloud-Riesen wie AWS und Azure unrealistisch ist, da Kapazitäten und Kosten ein Problem darstellen.

    Im Gegensatz dazu hat China Telecom das weltweit größte Quantenkommunikationsnetz gestartet (https://www.golem.de/news/16-staedte-vernetzt-china-telecom-baut-groesstes-quantenkommunikationsnetz-2505-196421.html), das 16 Städte mit Quantenschlüsselverteilung und Post-Quanten-Kryptographie verbindet, widerstandsfähig gegen Quantencomputer-Angriffe. Dieses 1.100-Kilometer-Netzwerk unterstützt 500 Behörden und signalisiert einen globalen Wettlauf in der Cybersicherheit.

    Ausblickend wird das Festival der Zukunft in München (https://www.1e9.community/festival-der-zukunft/programm/2025) vom 3. bis 6. Juli 2025 Next-Gen-KI und Quantencomputing präsentieren, während Apples WWDC 2025 (https://t3n.de/news/apple-wwdc-2025-1689705/) ein „Solarium“-Redesign für seine Betriebssysteme ankündigt. Apples vorsichtiger KI-Ansatz, mit Siri-Verbesserungen erst 2026-2027, kontrastiert mit Googles aggressiver Integration – ein spannender Gegensatz.

    Fazit und Reflexion

    Markus faszinieren die Fortschritte in der Quantenkommunikation, die die rasante Tech-Entwicklung seit den 1990ern widerspiegeln. Sarah hebt die Hosting-Debatte hervor, die die Bedeutung digitaler Kontrolle in Zeiten regulatorischer Veränderungen zeigt. Die Folge fordert ein Gleichgewicht zwischen Innovation und Souveränität. Zukünftige Themen könnten Quantencomputing im Hosting oder KI-Regulierungen behandeln – Hörer sind eingeladen, Vorschläge an info@goneoserver.de oder @goneo auf X zu senden.

    Die Episode ist unter https://www.goneo.de/blog/podcast/ oder bei Apple sowie Spotify verfügbar und bietet spannende Einblicke für Webprofis und Technikbegeisterte. Hört rein, teilt eure Gedanken und bleibt mit goneo am Puls der digitalen Zukunft!

  • BBC unter Beschuss – mal wieder

    Es gibt einige Kreise in Groß Britannien, die die staatliche Rundfunkorganisation BBC mal wieder schlachten wollen. BBC ist die Abkürzung für British Broadcasting Corporation und ist für uns in Deutschland deswegen von Bedeutung, da die BBC sozusagen das Modell der Alliierten für die Rundfunkorganisation in Deutschland nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg war.

    https://www.rnd.de/medien/tantchen-bbc-in-der-krise-nach-enthuellungen-um-diana-interview-geht-es-der-anstalt-noch-schlechter-7CGDC2F375EC3HSQPXJDOPMKBU.html

    (mehr …)
  • Mobility as a Service

    Mobility as a Service

    Die Public Transportation – Community traf sich gerade in Stockholm beim UITP Global Public Transportation Summit 2019. Alle, die mit ÖPNV zu tun haben, also Vertreter von Herstellern, Anbietern und Aufgabenträgern fanden sich hier ein.

    Zentrale Frage: Wie bewältigt man heute und morgen den täglichen Transport von Menschen in Metropolen und kleineren Großstädten?

    (mehr …)

  • Wozu gibt es den Menschen Medien Technologie – Podcast?

    Ich bin der Meinung, dass sich der technologische Wandel sehr schnell vollzieht. Das ist als Erkenntnis inzwischen überall angekommen und kein Geheimnis mehr, aber viele stehen diesen Entwicklungen, der “Digitalisierung” wie man gerne so schön sagt, reserviert bis ablehnend gegenüber. Ich bin der Meinung, das Mediensystem, das wir haben, informiert nicht besonders gut über digital-technologische Themen.

    Markus Käkenmeister mmt Podcast Menschen medien Technologie
    mmt – Menschen Medien Technologie Podcast – jede Woche eine neue Episode auf itunes, Stitcher, Spotify und zu abonnieren als RSS-Feedhttps://menschenmedien.technology

    Wenn man sich die Berichterstattung ansieht, wie etwa zu Anfang des Jahres mit dem Promi-Doxing, dann wird das deutlich. Was da an Blödsinn verbreitet wurde, war manchmal nicht zu fassen. Ähnlich uninformiert sind Beiträge im Zusammenhang mit Datenschutz oder Urheberangelegenheiten. Google, Facebook, Amazon werden aktuell zu mafiösen Betrügern stilisiert.

    (mehr …)

  • „Digital angekommen“?

    Die Digitalisierung sei „in der Mitte der Gesellschaft angekommen“. Das ist so eine Worthülse wie „man muss die Leute abholen, wo sie sind“ – schön in einem Meeting, in dem gerne Bullshit-Bingo gespielt wird und well-feeling angesagt ist. Sagt aber leider gar nix. „Digitalisierung“ ist als Begriff komplett unscharf und kann in alle Richtungen gedeutet werden, so wie auch „Industrie 4.0“.

    Was wirklichen helfen könnte, AI zu verstehen: Es selbst auszuprobieren.

    Die erwähnte Worthülse geht zurück auf eine Studie, die vorgestellt worden ist – und man vermutet es schon beim Hören – es ist ein politisches Ding. Die Studie heißt „d21 Digitalindex 2018-2019“ und ist vom Bundeswirtschaftsministerium gefördert worden. Peter Altmair hat dann auch die Ergebnisse präsentiert.

    (mehr …)
  • Fake-Netzwerk-Löschungen auf Facebook: So viel ist es auch wieder nicht

    Fake-Netzwerk-Löschungen auf Facebook: So viel ist es auch wieder nicht

    „Inauthentic coordinated behavior“ ist der Facebook-Sprech für Fake News und Fake Seiten, Fake Gruppen und Fake Profile. Man könnte diesen Terminus übersetzen mit „nicht authentisches koordiniertes Verhalten“. also Verhalten, das Akteure in sozialen Netzwerken an den Tag legen, indem sie Dinge posten, die für eine Interessensgruppe nützlich sind, wobei diese Gruppe aber nicht offen in Erscheinung tritt. 

    Im Rahmen der „Fix-Facebook“-Initiative versucht das soziale Netzwerk offenbar nur, diesem Missbrauch entgegen zu treten. Entsprechende Unternehmensmeldungen des Zuckerberg-Netzwerks schaffen es in deutsche Normalmedien: 

    (mehr …)